Question bizarre but 'the VE who thinks in this regard. Don 't think that the first company to provide the "use" unlimited inexpensive mobile; obtain all trade and finally make ton of money? I did not understand why the fact that you should pay "airtime".
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
This post has 2 comments
July 10th, 2008
The problem is that most of the profit goes straight back into the companies. It’s pretty expensive to build and upkeep the cell phone towers. To get licensing from the FCC, the rights for the land, and construction of a tower, it can cost up to $500,000. That’s one tower. Now think of all the towers that a carrier has to support nationwide. That doesn’t include upkeep either. Then add in all the bandwidth that they need to pay for when it comes to data services like text messaging or email (let alone mobile TV or streaming music). Carriers also take a hit every time they sell a phone. A phone that you get for free usually retails for around $200. The cost to the company for a phone that price might be $130. So when you sign a contract, the company loses $130. They need to make up that cost too. There are also all of the employees that the carrier needs to pay. Would you rather sit on hold for 45 minutes to reach someone in India that doesn’t have a clue about what cell service in the US is like, or would you rather spend 2 minutes on hold to speak to someone that lives in your general vicinity? There are thousands of people employed strictly to handle customer service over the phone every day.
Think of it this way. You’re not really paying for airtime. You’re paying for the ability to get a phone at little to no cost when you start service, you’re paying for the ability to use your phone when and where you need it, and you’re paying for customer service.
To answer your question, they don’t provide everything for cheap and/or free because they would go bankrupt pretty quickly doing so. Remember Amp’d Mobile? They might even still have commercials on TV. They offered unlimited text and data use for $49.99 with no contract. They filed bankruptcy last month.
July 13th, 2008
Profits, gigantic profits! That is what they are in business for and they are very good at it, if anything they will only find ways to make the profits bigger.
What is Your Opinion?